As more detailed information about the President’s fiscal year (FY) 2015 budget requests to Congress is released, the results continue to be a mixed bag for global health research and development (R&D). The Congressional Budget Justifications—annual presentations to Congress to justify requests for funding—help shed a light into the administration’s priorities for FY 2015. National Institutes of Health (NIH) While the President made a modest request for overall NIH funding, the release of the NIH congressional budget justifications gives us a better sense of how the President hopes to fund specific institutes and programs at the agency. The National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIAID) did include increases of $5.76 million for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, $6.95 million for infectious and immunologic diseases, and $23.4 million for HIV and AIDS research compared with funding for FY 2014. The President’s request for the Office of AIDS Research—which covers all HIV and AIDS activities within all of the centers at NIH—was $3.004 billion. While this is nearly a $20 million increase from 2014 enacted levels, this number is still below enacted numbers for 2011 and 2012. Within this request was a decrease of 0.4 percent from 2014 funding for microbicides, an increase of 0.8 percent for vaccine research and a decrease of 1.4 percent for therapeutics research. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Historically, research at the CDC has led to major advances against devastating diseases, including the eradication of smallpox and advances in AIDS research. With a disappointing funding request for NIH, we were glad to see a much stronger request for the global health budget within the CDC. The President’s request included $445.29 million for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious diseases, a $54.85 million increase from FY 2014 levels. Included in this was the $30 million requested for the Advanced Molecular Detection Initiative. The $30 million will go towards investments in advanced molecular detection technologies to help speed up outbreak detection and increase response efficacy. We’re glad to see the Administration acknowledging the need for the CDC to be cutting-edge in an increasingly global arena. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Amongst the government agencies involved in various stages of the development pipeline, the FDA has a vital role to play in accelerating the review of new global health products and strengthening the global regulatory system. Despite the tough budgetary times we currently face, Congress has been asking the FDA to do more with less. That said, we were pleased to see the President acknowledge that increased authority should also mean increased funding, with a robust request of $4.7 billion for the FDA, an 8.1 percent increase from Congress’ appropriation for 2014. The FDA’s Congressional Budget Justification acknowledged the unique role of the agency as an important international collaborator for global health through research and information sharing. The language specifically highlights the Biologics Program and its work to promote research and information sharing to facilitate access to vaccines and other products, harmonize regulatory standards, and establish and maintain standards for biologics. Another highlight is the news that FDA is in the process of drafting a proposed rule to add to their current list of neglected diseases for which they can allow accelerated reviews, and is specifically considering adding Chagas disease. US Agency for International Development (USAID) As we reported in our first blog post, while funding for global health at USAID and the Department of State was fairly disappointing, we were pleased to see an increase in the President’s request for malaria. Notable in this request was acknowledgement of the need for continued funding for R&D to support “the development of new malaria vaccine candidates, antimalarial drugs, new insecticides, and other malaria related research with multilateral donors.” Also in the USAID request was $153 million in central funding to accelerate science, technology innovation, and partnership. USAID describes this aim to “develop and scale breakthrough solutions and accelerate the transformation of the United States’ development enterprise by leveraging outside resources and improving the sustainability of development programs by attracting private-sector, market driven resources.” Department of Defense (DoD) DoD is the only US agency that funds global health research and product development from discovery to introduction. While we’re still sifting through all of the details in the Defense budget justifications, R&D at the agency—including health R&D—increased overall by 1.7 percent over FY 2014 enacted levels. Much of the global health research at DoD is funded through the Army’s Research, Development Testing and Evaluation (RDT&E) division as well as the Defense Health Program—including research on HIV and AIDS, malaria, and leishmaniasis. While we’re grateful the administration is continuing to recognize the need for sustained, robust support for global health R&D across several agencies, the decline of global health research funding in some key accounts remains concerning. We’ll look to Congress to equip these agencies with the necessary resources to carry out their essential role in developing new global health tools.

In this guest post, Jenny Howell—senior policy & advocacy associate at PATH working with the GHTC—writes about the new budget compromise that re-opened the federal government, as well as the effect of the government shutdown on health research programs. After more than two weeks of a federal government shutdown, with concurrent concerns about the threat of the debt ceiling being reached this week, policymakers finally reached a deal last night to re-open the government. Details of the budget compromise are finally starting to emerge, including the impact on global health research and development (R&D) programs. Things looked grim on Tuesday night after House Speaker, Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio), was unable to get enough support from his own party for a House bill to reopen the government and raise the debt ceiling. Thankfully, Senate Leaders were quick to ease fears and announced they had come up with a bi-partisan deal early Wednesday morning. After more than two weeks of a federal government shutdown, with concurrent concerns about the threat of the debt ceiling being reached this week, policymakers finally reached a deal last night to re-open the government. Congress approves Senate plan The Senate’s proposal extends current government spending levels through January 15th, 2014, immediately re-opening the government and allowing federal employees to return to work this morning. The debt limit would be extended through February 7th, 2014, giving Congress more time to work out a permanent deal and avoid default on US debt obligations. After all the drama around delaying the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Senate plan changes very little, only requiring stricter income verification requirements for determining who is eligible for federal subsidies through the ACA. The proposal also calls for a budget conference, made up of appointed members from both chambers of Congress who will be tasked with reconciling House and Senate budgets and agreeing to a long-term spending plan by December 13th, 2013. Unable to come up with their own plan to end the government shutdown and short on time, House Republicans voted to approve the Senate’s deal late last night, avoiding a default that would have put the nation’s credit rating at risk and potentially sent the economy into relapse. Impacts of the shutdown Despite the agreement, after 16 days of only a partially operating government, impacts were felt deeply across the nation. With the shutdown coming on the back of the budget sequester, research activities have been particularly hard hit, with four of the five Nobel-prize winners currently employed by the government furloughed. NIH Three-fourths of the staff at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were furloughed. While the NIH has continued to provide care for patients in ongoing clinical trials, admitting new patients and beginning new trials has halted for all but the most critical life-threatening cases. In a typical week the NIH admits 200 new patients, in the wake of the shutdown, only 12 new patients have been admitted for trials. CDC Almost as hard hit as the NIH, the shutdown has meant that two-thirds of the staff at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were furloughed. The timing of the shutdown comes just at the peak of flu season, significantly altering the CDC’s ability to monitor the spread of influenza and engage in vaccination outreach. NSF The National Science Foundation (NSF) furloughed 98 percent of its staff and has completely stopped issuing any new research grants. As federal employees come back to work and normal government functions resume, it will be hard to deny the long-term impact that the 16-day shutdown had across our nation. We may never know what discoveries have been delayed and whose health has been put at risk from the shutdown, but we’re hopeful lawmakers will stop playing games and will move forward with long-term solutions.

In this guest post, Jenny Howell—senior policy & advocacy associate at PATH working with the GHTC—writes about how the government shutdown and budget negotiations in Congress will impact global health research and development (R&D) programs across the federal government. She also provides an update on new legislation that would impact the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). It’s been a hectic few weeks in Washington. When House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) canceled last week’s scheduled recess—and lawmakers from both chambers stayed to work over the weekend—we hoped that policymakers could successfully prevent a government shutdown. Because members of Congress have been unable to agree on long-term budget deals, funding for the government has been based on short-term continuing resolutions (CR)—stopgap budgets that fund the government for a few months at a time. The last short-term deal, passed in March, funded the government through the end of September, requiring Congress to pass a new CR by midnight on September 30 or face a federal shutdown. What the shutdown means in practical terms varies across the government--from Congress to agencies such as USAID, NIH, CDC, and FDA. The past week has been a Ping-Pong between competing House and Senate budget bills, with Republicans in the House insisting on a CR that is coupled with the defunding or delay of the Affordable Care Act. Senate leaders, on the other hand, pledged that they will only consider a “clean CR,” or a bill that doesn’t contain major policy changes but only deals with funding. What the shutdown means in practical terms varies across the government. Congress On the Hill, it’s up to lawmakers to determine which staffers serve essential functions and which staffers are non-essential. Therefore, staffing will vary greatly from office-to-office. USAID The US Agency for International Development (USAID) issued a guidance outlining a few possible scenarios, but indicated that the majority of its contracts and grants are not dependent on new appropriations and will continue operations. The agency has promised to contact partners who have grants or contracts that will be directly impacted by the government shutdown. While most ongoing programs should remain safe with existing funding, this also means USAID won’t be investing in any new R&D funding, contracts, or grants until a budget deal is reached. HHS The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has also released its contingency plan in the case of a shutdown. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) will continue caring for patients in current clinical centers. However, health research will be severely impacted as NIH will not accept new patients for clinical research. This is on top of an already exhausted post-sequestration budget that NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins has described as delaying innovation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will continue to operate its 24/7 operations center, as well as activities funded through mandatory spending like PEPFAR, the Global AIDS program, and the Vaccines for Children program. The shutdown does impact CDC’s ability to support the annual flu program and much of its ongoing disease surveillance and R&D activities. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will continue activities related to critical public health issues, but will cease the majority of lab research, routine inspections, monitoring, and notification programs. The FDA will continue the majority of its programs linked to user fees, including product approvals, but approval times may be delayed as a result of understaffing. Moving on PEPFAR Amidst the tension of the budget battle, members of Congress have seemingly found something they agree on. On September 24, Sens. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Bob Corker (R-TN) introduced The PEPFAR Stewardship and Oversight Act of 2013 (S 1545). A day later, Reps. Eliot Engel (D-NY), Ed Royce (R-CA), Barbara Lee (D-CA), and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) introduced a companion bill in the House (HR 3177) Most of the PEPFAR program can continue to operate as long as Congress appropriates funds. However, some components—mostly reporting requirements—could end without renewal. The bill introduced last week is by no means a full reauthorization and is extremely limited in scope, only extending the PEPFAR program as it relates to HIV and AIDS with no specific extension of tuberculosis (TB) or malaria programming or funding. PEPFAR currently supports a variety of global health R&D projects, including research on microbicides and vaccines for HIV and AIDS, TB, and malaria. Bill status The bill is already moving quickly and with the addition of a short manager’s amendment, it was approved by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations by voice vote earlier this week. The manager’s amendment added reporting requirements to include reporting on co-infections and co-morbidities of HIV and AIDS, including TB, as well as country efforts to improve health work force issues. The government shutdown makes next steps for the bill uncertain, but the strong bipartisan support makes it likely that leadership in both chambers will fast track the bill and bring it up for consideration without additional amendments. Looking ahead We hope support for PEPFAR isn’t the only thing Congress can come to an agreement on this week. While uncertainty about the impact of the shutdown remains high, the quicker that lawmakers can reach an agreement the less severe the negative effects will be across our nation and around the world. Whatever the outcome, we’ll continue to track the progress and its potential impact on global health R&D.