Search the GHTC website
March 11, 2014

The Global Health Technologies Coalition (GHTC) today released a new paper providing unique insight into the regulatory barriers incurred by nonprofits in global health research and development (R&D). The paper examines the most significant challenges organizations face in navigating the regulatory landscape to advance the development of new vaccines, drugs, diagnostics, microbicides, and devices for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

The paper focuses on nonprofit product development organizations (NPPDs), or nongovernmental organizations that partner with the public, philanthropic, and private sectors to develop health products specifically targeted for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, neglected tropical diseases, maternal health, and other needs in LMICs. Previous research has found that NPPDs play a vital role in bringing together the fragmented resources and expertise of the various sectors involved in neglected disease R&D.

The new paper finds that regulatory processes and obstacles can vary widely depending on product and geography. Each of these challenges has a significant impact on the ability for NPPDs and their partners to ensure new technologies are available for patients in LMICs. NPPDs identified three key regulatory challenges, including:

  • Complex global regulatory environment: the regulatory landscape for products targeting the health needs of LMICs is difficult to navigate because of the different levels of regulatory oversight across a spectrum of experience and expertise.
  • Weak regulatory capacity in LMICs: regulatory authorities in LMICs lack sufficient resources to reliably evaluate and monitor the safety, efficacy, and quality of all types of health products.
  • The need for increased investment in regulatory capacity within NPPDs: the robust pipelines and increasing product responsibilities necessitate strengthening internal regulatory capacity of the NPPDs.

While the regulatory landscape for the R&D of health products addressing poverty-related and neglected diseases and conditions is complex, NPPDs and their partners continue to grow their pipelines. Therefore, NPPDs contributing to this paper outlined a set of key recommendations to strengthen regulatory processes:

  • Best practice is to develop a regulatory strategy at the beginning of the development cycle that outlines activities through product registration.
  • All regulatory bodies should possess a foundational level of core competencies.
  • Regulatory harmonization and capacity strengthening should encourage collaboration of poorly resourced regulatory bodies with better-resourced and more experienced regulatory authorities.
  • It is critical to educate non-regulatory stakeholders on the impact of regulatory delays on increasing the cost and length of product development and introduction to make the case for increased investment.

This paper—Briefing Paper, Volume 4: Addressing regulatory challenges throughout the product development process—is the fourth in a series from the GHTC that examines financing, accessibility, regulatory, and capacity issues facing NPPDs. The series aims to inform global policy and financing discussions about R&D for neglected and poverty-related diseases affecting LMICs.