News

Today, the GlobalPost’s “Global Pulse” blog posted a series of video interviews that GHTC conducted with prominent Americans and leading US health officials about why Americans should care about global health and research. On Tuesday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will be delivering a major speech on the HIV and AIDS pandemic at the National Institutes of Health. Clinton’s speech is expected to highlight US leadership in research and innovation for HIV and AIDS, particularly in developing treatment and prevention tools. Against that backdrop, the Global Health Technologies Coalition (GHTC), a Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group promoting global health research and development, interviewed prominent Americans and leading US health officials on why Americans should care about the issue. Here are the short responses from actress Whoopi Goldberg; Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.); US Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg; and Amie Batson, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Global Health at the US Agency for International Development. We’d also like to hear from you. In the Comments section, leave a note or send a link to a YouTube video explaining why Americans should care about global health research. Amie Batson on Why Americans Should Care about Global Health Research: FDA Commissioner, Margaret Hamburg: Representative Ed Markey (D-Mass): Whoopi Goldberg:

Center for Global Development (CGD), a Washington DC-based think-tank that works to reduce global poverty and inequality through research, officially released its newest report on global health earlier this week. The launch brought together donors, academics, public health officials, and representatives from the pharmaceutical industry to continue an important conversation about improving one of the biggest challenges in global health: bringing the best health tools that research has to offer to the people who need them most through improved regulatory pathways. The report, called Safer, Faster, Cheaper: Improving Clinical Trials and Regulatory Pathways to Fight Neglected Disease, outlines a two-pronged approach—establishing regional regulatory pathways for the oversight of clinical trials, and building quality and cost-efficiency into trial planning and design. The report was the product of a working group that included representatives from donor groups, philanthropy groups, product development partnerships (PDPs), consulting firms, the pharmaceutical industry, government, researchers, and developing and developed country regulators. New report from Center for Global Development highlights need to improve regulatory pathways to help deliver health tools to the people who need them the most. Photo Credit: Satvir Malhotra Working group chair Tom Bollyky from the Center on Foreign Relations noted that navigating through even a single regulatory pathway can often be the most challenging part of bringing new products to market. Yet, many global health product developers find themselves needing to navigate not one but several regulatory pathways, often overseen by authorities with severely limited capacity, making the process seem insurmountable. According to the working group, a unified approach to approving and overseeing clinical trials could dramatically speed up product development and delivery. CGD’s report proposes “a centralized procedure model in which participating regulatory bodies and ethics committees jointly approve and oversee clinical trials for neglected disease technologies.” Additionally, the working group proposed that changes be made with clinical trials themselves—specifically the way they are organized and financed. Clinical trials are often modeled off of previous, successful clinical trials, most of which occur in wealthy countries. As a result, trial protocols have become extremely complex and expensive to carry out, putting them out of reach for developing countries where, too often, resources are sparse. Further, the working group recommends more input from local investigators and independent stakeholders early on in the clinical trial design. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Margaret Hamburg highlighted the need for new ideas and processes to advance global health technologies and regulatory pathways in her keynote address. In speaking of the FDA’s interest in the new report, she told that audience that failing to address the needs of the developing world’s health concerns undermines the health, security, and wellbeing of us all. She added that now, more than ever, global diseases need global solutions.

Jeff Meer is special advisor for global health policy and development at the Public Health Institute (PHI), a GHTC member. Based in Washington, DC, he provides strategic guidance to the organization on global health advocacy and develops new business proposals for global health projects. On Nov. 3-4, the Coalition Advancing Multipurpose Innovations (CAMI), a project of PHI, convened a symposium in Washington, DC, on “Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (MPTs) for Reproductive Health.” The gathering was attended by more than 100 product developers, researchers, academics, funding organizations, nongovernmental organization leaders, policymakers, and reproductive health practitioners. Participants discussed how best to advance emerging MPT science, with the goal of providing women around the world with safe, effective, low cost, and user-friendly means of protecting themselves simultaneously from HIV, other sexually transmitted and reproductive tract infections, and/or unintended pregnancy. The conference, funded primarily by the US Agency for International Development (USAID)’s Global Health Bureau and held at the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation’s Barbara Jordan Conference Center, follows a think tank convened earlier this year under the auspices of the Initiative for Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (IMPT), which is led by Bethany Young Holt of PHI. Other funders for the symposium include the National Institute of Health’s Office of AIDS Research, Gilead, and the Mary Wohlford Foundation. Dr. Young Holt directs CAMI, which serves as secretariat to the IMPT at PHI. Conference held to discuss Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (MPTs) and how they can help improve reproductive health to help women around the world . Photo Credit: Nguyen Ba Quang/PATH There are technologies already available to prevent unintended pregnancy and also block sexually transmitted infections. These include the male and female condom. However, newer MPTs are based on other technologies that may be more useable in some geographic and cultural contexts. These include impregnated vaginal rings, barrier devices, gels, and vaccines. The MPT field is developing a range of options for women, some of which may be more appropriate for different points in the life cycle. There are more than one dozen important MPTs now in development and testing, and some are much closer to commercial introduction than others. Among the topics covered at the symposium were: the state of the scientific field in developing MPTs; pressing issues like the effect of hormonal contraception on acquisition of HIV; the perspective of product developers; and regulatory pathways for MPTs in the United States and abroad. Other topics covered include: lessons learned from introduction of other reproductive health technologies; integrating end-user needs in product development; donor perspectives; public-private partnerships for MPT development; and political leadership on MPTs. Many experts consider MPTs to be a key global health technology area. Technologies such as MPTs that address multiple global health challenges—similar to vaccines that address more than one illness—can be both efficient and cost-effective interventions. And the twin challenges of preventing unintended pregnancy in order to reduce maternal mortality and reducing the transmission of HIV and AIDS are certainly high on the global agenda: they are the subject of United Nations Millennium Development Goals 5 and 6. Also, making inroads in these areas could offer substantial cost savings to governments and consumers alike. For example, in the United States alone, the estimated direct medical cost of unintended pregnancies in 2002 was $5 billion. Direct medical costs associated with treatment and care of sexually-transmitted infections in the United States in 2006 were even higher—approximately $14.6 billion. Despite this encouraging landscape, the MPT field is also fraught with challenges. Collaboration across scientific disciplines is never simple, and the worlds of research on contraception and sexually-transmitted infections do not necessarily regularly intersect. There are also significant regulatory hurdles to the introduction of technologies that deal with multiple health issues, and these can be daunting in trying to introduce even helpful and potentially life-saving technologies on a global scale. And any global health technology must pass the ultimate test of user acceptability. This symposium is meant to ask and answer some of these vexing questions, so that MPTs can be introduced successfully the first and every time. More information about the rationale for MPTs can be reviewed here.