News

The Toxoplasma gondii parasite is infamous for consuming brain tissue, causing brain cancer, and even altering the behavior of infected individuals. However, new research suggests that it could be modified and used to treat ovarian cancer. The team of scientists at Dartmouth University created a weakened version of T. gondii, removing the genes that enable the parasite to take over its host’s cells. Next, mice with aggressive ovarian cancer were inoculated with the weakened parasite. The study demonstrated that the presence of T. gondii, along with certain proteins excreted by the parasite, resulted in an enhanced immune response to ovarian cancer tumors. While none of the mice were completely cured—which could in part be attributable to the late stage of cancer at the time of treatment—those treated with the weakened parasite survived an additional 40 days on average. The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued new treatment guidelines for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, as the three sexually transmitted infections (STIs) grow increasingly resistant to antibiotics. While resistant strains of chlamydia and syphilis are rare, multidrug-resistant gonorrhea has emerged in at least ten countries, and resistance to six classes of antibiotics has been reported. The WHO is calling for enhanced surveillance of drug-resistant strains of gonorrhea, and recommends that national treatment guidelines be determined based on local patterns of resistance. While syphilis is curable with a single dose of benzathine penicillin, the supply of the drug is low, and stock outs have been reported in a number of countries. While early stages of these three STIs are often asymptomatic, they can cause significant long-term damage, including pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. Furthermore, they can be transmitted from mother-to-child during pregnancy and childbirth, and can increase the risk of ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth, and newborn death. As bacteria grow resistant to antibiotics, so too do fungi to antifungals. Each year, fungal infections result in 1 million deaths, and strains of both the aspergillus and candida fungi are growing resistant to the azole class of antifungals. While there are more than 20 classes of antibiotics, there are only four classes of antifungals, and thus, resistance to just one class of medicines is a major cause for concern. Scientists believe the leading cause of fungal resistance is the widespread use of fungicides on crops and in certain household paints and coatings. While dissecting mosquitoes in Guaico, Trinidad, researchers at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases discovered a new and bewildering virus, configured unlike any other virus known to infect animals. Most viruses are comprised of a handful of genes packaged into one particle, however, the five genes of Guaico Culex exist as independent particles, and can only infect a mosquito if at least four of the five are present. Previously, viruses with this structure—known as multicomponent genomes—had only been found in plants and fungi. While humans are not susceptible to Guiaco Culex, a related virus has been found in monkeys, indicating that another multicomponent virus could infect humans.

In this regular feature on Breakthroughs, we highlight some of the most interesting reads in global health research from the past week. In this edition, we cover new insights into the impact of the Zika virus on the brain. Researchers have released medical images of 46 fetuses and infants born to women who were infected with the Zika virus during pregnancy, revealing serious brain damage beyond microcephaly. The images, which include 23 MRI scans, 41 CT scans, and 93 ultrasounds, were taken at Instituto de Pesquisa in Campina Grande State Paraiba in northeastern Brazil and analyzed by neurologists at the Instituto in partnership with a team at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. The brain damage manifests in distinct ways: many of the scans showed skulls filled with cerebrospinal fluid, and in one case there was so little brain tissue that the skull collapsed in on itself, resulting in a flattened skull with extra skin. The images indicated damage to the brain stem, which regulates breathing and heart rate; the cerebellum, which is responsible for motor control; and the cortex, which is involved for learning, memory, emotion, and language. New research suggests that Hofbauer cells, found in the placenta and tasked with protecting the fetus from pathogens, may be the key to the Zika virus' ability to cross the maternal-fetal barrier. Hofbauer cells are macrophages, immune cells that combat pathogens by consuming them. However, dengue virus—a flavivirus related to Zika—is able to hijack macrophages, using them to replicate and disseminate throughout the body. While the researchers have confirmed that the Zika virus is able to survive within Hofbauer cells, they suspect that the immune cells may also be enabling the virus to travel to the fetal brain. The study also confirms that the virus can replicate within fibroblasts, a critical component of the placenta’s structure, a finding described as, “a bit of a surprise,” by one of the study’s authors. Scientists at Rockefeller University have also described their recent findings as "kind of a surprise," in this case, that certain adult brain cells are also susceptible to the virus. Fetal brains are primarily comprised of neural progenitor cells; while these stems cells are not as ubiquitous in adults, they play a critical role in learning and memory. Earlier this year, researchers determined that fetal neural progenitor cells are particularly vulnerable to Zika. Now, the team at Rockefeller has confirmed that adult neural progenitor cells are no exception. The study revealed an increase in cell death but a decrease in the production of new brain cells in infected adult mice. More research is needed to determine how this translates to humans, however, such damage could increase risk for cognitive challenges, depression, and Alzheimer’s disease.

Penicillin, the world’s first antibiotic, works by targeting certain proteins—appropriately named penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs)—that play a critical role in building and maintaining the bacterial cell wall. Now, scientists at Harvard Medical School have identified another class of proteins which play a similar role and could be a target for the next generation of antibiotics. The road to discovery started in 2003, when it was determined that certain bacteria could grow without PBPs. In their absence, the proteins responsible for maintaining cell wall shape, elongation, division, and spore formation (SEDS proteins) continued to function normally, enabling the bacteria to thrive. SEDS proteins are found in more types of bacteria than PBPs, and consequently a treatment targeting SEDS proteins could have even broader application than penicillin. On February 22, the Obama Administration requested US$1.9 billion in emergency funding for the Zika response, and 181 days later, Congress has yet to approve it. Consequently, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has shifted $81 million from other programs to support Zika vaccine research and development—$34 million of which will go to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and $47 million of which will be allocated to the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). Earlier this year, HHS repurposed $589 million in funding from the Ebola response to combat Zika, however, that funding will run out by the end of this month. The NIH will use its funding for human clinical trials of its leading Zika vaccine candidate, however, the agency will need an additional $196 million for additional trials and to advance a second and third candidate. BARDA’s funding will enable the agency to secure contracts and establish partnerships for Zika vaccine development, however, an additional $342 million will be required to continue its work. New research suggests that infection with the Plasmodium parasite, which causes malaria, could reduce the severity of Ebola infection. A team of scientists at the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has examined 1,868 blood samples from an Ebola treatment unit in Liberia—1,182 of which tested positive for Ebola—concluding that patients co-infected with malaria were 20 percent more likely to survive. These results held true even when controlling for the patient’s age and viral load. Viral load actually correlated with survival rates: those with the highest levels of Plasmodium had an 83 percent survival rate, compared to 46 percent of those only infected with Ebola. At the treatment center, all patients were provided with antimalarials, and consequently, treatment for malaria was not responsible for survival rates. While the reason for this trend remains a mystery, Drs. Emmie de Wit and Kyle Rosenke—the study’s lead scientists—suspect that an existing malaria infection expedites the immune response to Ebola, consequently increasing survival rates.

Erin Will Morton. Photo: GHTCChange is never easy, and today is no exception. On my last day with GHTC, I have so much to look back at and reflect on. It is a bittersweet transition to leave this great team of people. Together with our members we have built a strong coalition and can be proud of our impact in global health research and development (R&D). But today is not a day to look back. It is time to look forward. On to 2017 and the future of global health R&D. We have a lot of work ahead of us and much to look forward to. The coalition will continue to thrive and be the strong collective voice of the global health research community. In my new role as a member of the coalition, I look forward to working with all of you to hold policymakers accountable for the public sector’s role in research. We know our mission is strong. We know we fight for a good cause. But it is not always that easy to convince decision-makers that this is the right thing to do. To help build our case, GHTC is working on two reports to help build our advocacy capacity. The first is a comprehensive overview of the US government’s role in global health R&D. Examining both funding and policies, GHTC and the research team at Duke University’s Margolis Center for Health Policy and Global Health Institute are digging deep on what the government is doing, where there are gaps, what is working well, and what could be done better or different. Even when things seem to be working, we must continue to question process and look to find new solutions to advance the development of new tools to address our most pressing global health challenges. GHTC’s second report is an update to our 2012 Saving Lives and Creating Impact: Why investing in global health research works report with Policy Cures. Once again, GHTC and Policy Cures will look at the return on investment in global health R&D for the US government to help build a strong case for this continued role. I am looking forward to having both of these in hand for our advocacy work with a new Congress and new administration in 2017 and beyond. These reports and other evidence from members must continue to inform our advocacy work. In a challenging fiscal environment in which new money is hard to come by, we must make a strong case for our work. Global health R&D is a smart investment, it saves lives, and it can reduce health costs. These are the arguments we will continue to make. I am very proud of what we have accomplished over the last two years. Thank you to everyone who has supported me and GHTC’s mission. I look forward to continuing the fight and working to save and improve lives around the world!