Breakthroughs Blog: CDC

Interested in more global health innovation news? Every week GHTC scours media reports worldwide to deliver essential global health R&D news and content to your inbox. Sign-up now to receive our weekly R&D News Roundup email. Drug-resistant germs sicken about three million people every year in the United States and kill about 35,000, representing a much larger public health threat than previously understood, according to an updated report released last Wednesday from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC previously estimated in a 2013 report that about two million antibiotic resistant infections occur every year, causing 23,000 deaths. Using previously unavailable data and by applying new methods, the CDC calculated that the 2013 estimate missed about half of the yearly cases and deaths caused by antibiotic resistant infections. Infectious disease experts say that the new numbers, though still conservative, underscore the magnitude of the problem and establish a new national baseline of infections and deaths that will help prioritize resources to address the most pressing threats. Health authorities in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) have introduced a new Ebola vaccine produced by Johnson & Johnson (J&J) in an effort to combat the world’s second-worst outbreak of the virus on record. The new vaccine—which has completed phase 1 and 2 clinical trials and has been endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) —will be administered to 50,000 people in the city of Goma, on the Rwandan border. The experimental vaccine, which requires two injections eight weeks apart, will be rolled out alongside Merck’s single-dose Ebola vaccine. Merck’s vaccine has been administered to over 250,000 people since the start of the current outbreak in August 2018 through a strategy known as ring vaccination, offering the vaccine to contacts of those likely to be infected. The J&J vaccine will be provided to “targeted at-risk populations” in areas where the virus is not yet being actively transmitted, according to WHO. The European Commission granted marketing authorization to Merck’s Ebola vaccine, known as Ervebo, last Monday, making it the world’s first approved Ebola vaccine. This authorization comes less than one month after the European Medicines Agency recommended it to be licensed. A few days following this approval, Merck also received WHO prequalification, a process in which WHO assesses vaccines and other medical products in order to assure member countries that they are safe and effective. Merck said it will also continue to work with the US Food and Drug Administration and regulatory agencies in African countries to license the vaccine. Ervebo is currently being used in the DRC under a “compassionate use” or research protocol similar to a clinical trial. Merck expects the licensed doses will become available during the third quarter of 2020 and has made a commitment to make the vaccine available to countries eligible for purchasing assistance through Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, at the lowest possible price.

The Trump administration’s budget request for fiscal year 2020 (FY20) includes cuts that—if enacted—would hamstring the research and development (R&D) of new global health technologies funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), US Agency for International Development (USAID), and Department of Defense (DoD). Since the release of the budget request in early March, however, lawmakers from both parties have expressed their commitment to shielding these critical funding strings from the president’s scissors.Among the proposed cuts is a 12 percent reduction for NIH. On April 11, the Senate Appropriations Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee (LHHS) held a hearing to review the budget request for NIH. From the beginning, it was clear the administration’s proposal would face bipartisan pushback. Subcommittee Chairman Roy Blunt (R-MO), in his opening remarks, said, “I'm disappointed, of course, that the 2020 budget request would cut the agency by 13 percent. I'm confident that this committee will not do that, but we'll talk to you today about the reasons that we should continue in the direction we're in rather than head in another way.”Chairman Blunt was followed by Ranking Member Patty Murray (D-WA), who delivered an even stronger rebuke: “At a time of remarkable possibility in medical research, a time where we can and should continue leading the world in medical discovery, the Trump administration wants to cut funding for NIH… President Trump's damage -- damaging budget is wildly out of step with the sentiments of Congress, thankfully, and the American people. And I feel confident, working with our Chairman, that we will once again reject it.”Later in the hearing, Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL), who serves as Chairman of the full Senate Appropriations Committee, also voiced his support for an NIH funding increase:“What you do is more important than most [of] what we do in America. I'm not interested in cutting your budget. I'm interested in increasing it…I think this is a great investment for America, for the world, for humanity, what you do… it's not only a financial investment, which is good for the economy. It is the leading scientists, the cutting edge of scientific research that you add. And we all benefit from it immensely.”The week prior, the House Appropriations LHHS Subcommittee had held their hearing on the NIH budget. Subcommittee Chairwoman Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) said that Congress would reject proposed funding cuts to the NIH. In her opening statement she emphasized the value of scientists’ work: "Funding [biomedical] research has the power to do more good for more people than almost anything else within the purview of this subcommittee.”Referring to the administration’s newly launched effort to end the transission of HIV and AIDS in the United States, Chairwoman DeLauro continued: “Decades of research supported by NIH led to the development of the very treatment and prevention approaches that have put achieving this goal within reach, specifically antiretroviral therapy and PrEP. The NIH must be involved, if we are to continue to make progress in reducing HIV and AIDS, domestically and abroad.”In other budget hearings, lawmakers focused on important funding sources for global health R&D outside of NIH—including the DoD. In the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee hearing on the US Army budget on April 9, Rep. Betty McCollum (D-MN), Vice Chair of the Subcommittee and Co-chair of the House Global Health Caucus, pressed the Secretary of the Army and Army Chief of Staff about proposals to divert funding from malaria vaccine research funded by the US Army: “Given that malaria remains the number one infectious disease threat for troops deployed in these regions, and we know that we have issues with [treatment] compliance, whether it’s State Department, military, even Peace Corps volunteers because of the side of effects from these diseases, it remains critically important that the Army’s research on malaria vaccines continue. I’m concerned in the FY20 budget that the justification appears that the funding for the project that conducts malaria vaccine research is being realigned into other projects. Given nearly all the most effective widely-used anti-malarials were developed in part by the US military research team, I find the possibility of losing momentum in research extremely alarming.” With the ongoing outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Ebola is another infectious disease high on lawmakers’ radar. On March 14, the Senate Appropriations LHHS Subcommittee held a hearing on the Ebola outbreak in DRC and other emerging health threats. Subcommittee Chairman Blunt’s (R-MO) opening statement emphasized, “It is clear that our investments to improve global health have a direct impact on the wellbeing of every American.” He highlighted recent funding increases he has championed for the NIH National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the CDC, and the Global Health Security Agenda. Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) also expressed his support for global health research: “If you wanted to look at the most important room in Washington, DC, when it comes to medical research over the last few years, it would be this room, this subcommittee. Under the leadership of Chairman Blunt and Senator Murray, we have seen for four straight years a 5 percent increase and real growth at the NIH. I think an overall 30 percent over that period of time, the 5 percent real growth each year. Increases to the CDC I wish were equal, but they had been good. We hope they'll get better in the future. I reject the President's budget out of hand. This notion of 12 percent cut to the NIH is just unacceptable and I think most Democrats and Republicans would agree.”In addition to defending investments in biomedical R&D, lawmakers have expressed support for funding for international aid and development—which would be cut by 24 percent under the President’s budget proposal. On February 27, the House Appropriations State and Foreign Operations Subcommittee held an oversight hearing on USAID Programs and Policies. In her opening statement, Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Nita Lowey (D-NY) emphasized the value of USAID, stating, “Failing to maintain our position as the leader in global development and humanitarian assistance will cost lives, risk the spread of infectious diseases, and reduce American influence around the world.” Included in the budget proposal is a US$1.35 billion reduction to the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). In response, several lawmakers vigorously defended the United States’ role in addressing the international HIV and AIDS epidemic. On March 6, Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY), Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said, “I'm particularly opposed to cuts in funding for global AIDS programs. There's a 22 percent cut in PEPFAR used to treat millions internationally, mostly in Africa.” Later that month, Rep. Karen Bass (D-CA) also defended PEPFAR: “The administration has maintained most Africa focused aid initiatives launched by previous Congresses, and in some cases have sought to fund them, however at far lower levels. These include the global President's Emergency Plan for AIDS or PEPFAR…and I'm glad that those initiatives have continued but concerned about the cuts in funding. I will conclude by stressing…that US relations with Africa has always enjoyed bipartisan support here in Congress, and we expect to continue to work together. Each time the administration has sought to reduce funding, the State Department or USAID, especially those that would impact African countries, we have worked together in a bipartisan manner to restore that funding.”In early April, Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY) again affirmed his belief “in development as a way to advance American interest and security that’s rooted firmly in our values.” In reaction to the President’s budget proposal, he noted that, “Tuberculosis and malaria and AIDS patients all around the world” would be pushed aside by the “heartless and harmful approach to foreign policy.” The Trump administration’s budget request, if enacted, would slash funding for lifesaving research, development, and implementation of new global health technologies. Fortunately, lawmakers, with support from advocates, have diligently opposed these cuts. It’s our job to ensure this continues.

  2018 is shaping up to be another important year for US policy related to global health and medical research. As Congress returns for a busy work session and the White House continues to roll out policy reforms, here are the top five issues GHTC will be following in 2018: 1. US funding for global health R&D President Trump’s fiscal year 2018 (FY18) budget proposal called for dramatic cuts to global health, medical research, and public health accounts across the National Institutes of Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Department of State. While legislators pushed back sharply on these proposed cuts, Congress has not yet passed final FY18 spending bills. This means that we still do not have a final picture of what US government funding for global health and medical research will look like for this year. As Congress tries to navigate budget caps and other pressures that may constrain overall government spending, GHTC will continue to advocate for strong, stable public funding for critical global health and medical research programs. We’re also looking ahead to the fiscal year 2019 (FY19) budget and appropriations process, and bracing for a proposal from President Trump that may include even more significant spending cuts than those proposed in FY18. Despite verbal acknowledgement from the Trump Administration that US global health and medical research programs remain critically important, as the Administration continues plans to streamline government activities and reign-in spending, we do not expect to see prioritization of these issues reflected in Administration-driven spending proposals. GHTC will closely monitor FY19 proposals in the coming months and continue to engage with Congress, who ultimately sets government spending levels. 2. USAID and State Department reorganization As part of the Trump Administration’s plans to streamline and reshape the federal government, it has announced plans to reorganize the State Department and USAID. USAID plays an important role in global health research and development (R&D), supporting late-stage clinical research and implementation research as well as operating Grand Challenges to identify and advance promising health innovations from around the world. USAID and the State Department submitted reorganization plans to the White House Office of Management and Budget on September 15, 2017, but details of those plans have not yet been made public and further information remains scarce. GHTC will continue to monitor evolving plans and policy and strongly advocate for continued leadership of USAID in global health innovation. 3. BARDA reauthorization The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA), which authorizes the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), is due for reauthorization this year by Congress. In recent years, BARDA has played an increasingly important role in the advanced development of medical countermeasures for emerging infectious diseases, like Ebola and Zika, and antimicrobial resistance. Reauthorization presents a potential opportunity to bolster BARDA’s role in the global health R&D space. GHTC will monitor the PAHPA reauthorization process and work with Congress to support a strengthened role for BARDA in the emerging infectious disease space. 4. Global health security GHTC is also watching US efforts to promote global health security, including continued support for the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA)—an international partnership launched in 2014 to help countries strengthen their ability to respond to health threats. The United States is now funding GHSA through the one-time emergency Ebola supplemental funding, which expires in FY19, so future financing for the program remains uncertain. Without renewed commitment and financial support for global health security activities, the United States will have to pull back critical disease detection, prevention, and response operations around the world. GHTC will also work to include R&D in global health security policy decision-making. During the two most recent global disease epidemics, Ebola and Zika, a lack of proactive, sustainable funding for R&D meant that United States and the world did not have the drugs, diagnostics, and other tools needed to contain these diseases. Despite this, GHSA in its current form lacks any prioritization or commitment to R&D to detect, prevent, and respond to global epidemics. As domestic and global discussions on global health security continue, GHTC will advocate for R&D as a critical component of epidemic preparedness and response. 5. US engagement with key multilateral bodies Multilateral organizations and partnerships are vital mechanisms to help advance a healthier and more secure world. In our modern and increasingly globalized world, new, emerging, or long-standing health challenges, which do not respect borders, cannot be tackled by individual countries alone. Strong US leadership and funding for organizations like the United Nations (UN), the World Health Organization, and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria are key to advancing global health and ensuring that these organizations function effectively in support of US priorities. Despite several senior Trump Administration officials expressing support for strong multilateral engagement, the United States’ role in pushing for a recent $285 million cut to the UN’s overall budget appears more indicative of how the United States can be expected to engage in the near future. While it is currently unclear exactly how these cuts will be implemented across the various UN health-related programs, GHTC anticipates significant impact on the various UN technical agencies’ ability to support global health, including R&D. GHTC is committed to leading strong, coordinated action to advance US leadership in global health R&D in 2018 and beyond. The United States has long been a leader in global health, development, and medical research, and we look forward to sustaining and bolstering this legacy in the years ahead.  

There is no doubt that the past decade has brought transformative breakthroughs in global health innovation, from new medicines, to combatting leading child killers like malaria and tuberculosis (TB), to interventions that are making an AIDS-free generation possible. These game changers have saved millions of lives and helped unlock better health and opportunity for people around the world. The Global Health Technologies Coalition (GHTC) spent this past decade standing side-by-side in partnership with scientists and innovators, working to ensure they have the resources and supportive policies needed to advance innovation that truly drives impact. As we close out our tenth anniversary year and mark our first decade of advocacy, we wanted to take a moment to reflect on our shared progress and celebrate the headlines and moments that shaped global health research and development (R&D) over the past decade. Here are ten highlights: Could pills taken daily prevent HIV infection? That was a key question on researchers and activists minds in the early 2000s.By the end of the decade, the evidence pointed to yes. In 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of the antiretroviral drug Truvada as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection. While it took several more years for PrEP to begin to be approved and introduced in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), it has proved a powerful new tool in the global fight against HIV and AIDS. Revolutionary. Simple. Empowering. These are words that have been used to describe Sayana Press, an all-in-one injectable contraceptive developed by GHTC member PATH. Sayana Press combines a long-acting contraceptive with the easy-to-use Uniject injection system that involves minimal training, making it an especially suitable tool for low-resource settings and for women to self-administer. Since its introduction in 2014, more than 1 million doses of Sayana Press have been delivered to women worldwide, giving them greater power and autonomy over their reproductive health. Despite the fact that over 70 percent of all malaria deaths are children, before 2009 there was not a single high-quality malaria drug designed for kids. Instead, parents would crush adult tablets in what amounted to a daily struggle to provide an accurate dose as well as convince their kids to swallow these bitter tasting pills. This changed with the introduction of Coartem Dispersible, the first malaria medicine designed for children. Developed by GHTC member Medicines for Malaria Ventures, the medicine is affordable, easy-to-administer, sweet-tasting, and dosed for children. As of 2016, over 300 million treatments have been distributed worldwide, saving an estimated 750,000 lives. For more than a century, meningitis has ravaged a swath of the African continent known as the “meningitis belt,” killing one in ten people it sickened. But thanks to the efforts of a coalition of partners, including GHTC member PATH, we’ve stopped deadly meningitis A epidemics in their tracks. In 2010, MenAfriVac—a low-cost vaccine against mengingitis A—was introduced in Africa. Since then, more than 270 million people in 26 countries have been vaccinated, and thankfully, meningitis A is becoming a disease of the past. HIV and AIDS remains one of the greatest threats to women’s health globally, yet women and girls still lack the range of tools they need to protect themselves. Thanks to over a decade of effort by a unique partnership led by GHTC member the International Partnership for Microbicides, the future looks different. The partnership has advanced a new woman-center HIV prevention tool: a monthly, vaginal microbicide ring that deliver antiretroviral drugs. The groundbreaking new tool was found to reduce HIV risk in women in late-stage clinical trials in 2016, and it is now under regulatory review and poised for potential introduction worldwide. For parents with kids suffering from TB, getting their child to take multiple pills a day for months was a serious struggle, from trying to split up pills, to achieving the right dosage, to convincing children to swallow bitter tasting medicine. In 2016, this process became easier with the introduction of the first kid-friendly TB drugs. Developed by GHTC member TB Alliance, the drugs are appropriately dosed for children, dissolvable in water, and fruit-flavored to appeal to children. Already close to 80 countries, have adopted this improved treatment, with 700,000 courses ordered. Malaria has plagued humanity for tens of thousands of years. Fortunately, this past decade has brought a number of new and improved tools and approaches to tackle this age-old scourge, including the world’s first approved malaria vaccine, Mosquirix. In 2017, the World Health Organization announced plans to pilot the vaccine—developed by GHTC member PATH—in sub-Saharan Africa. While developing a high-efficacy vaccine against malaria has proved challenging due to the parasite’s complexity, Mosquirix, which reduced the rate of infection in children by 39 percent in clinical trials, is an important scientific breakthrough, and health officials hope it will prove a valuable addition in fighting malaria used alongside existing interventions. In 2014, the world’s deadliest Ebola outbreak caught the global community unaware and unprepared, devastating nations in Western Africa. While health workers went to work in the field to contain the immediate crisis, scientists went to work in their labs to develop a vaccine to prevent future epidemics. Thanks to research on Ebola vaccines that had been undertaken in the early 2000s, researchers were able to accelerate the leading Ebola vaccine candidate—RVSV-ZEBOV—from preclinical testing to phase III trials in less than two years. In 2016, it was announced that the vaccine was found nearly 100 percent effective in these trials. The vaccine could be approved by the FDA as early as 2019. More than two billion people worldwide suffer from hidden hunger—a condition characterized by deficiencies in micronutrients such as zinc, iron, and Vitamin A, which can cause stunted growth, blindness, and learning disabilities. In the 1990s, a young economist Howarth Bouis had a kernel of an idea: What if we could create better crops to provide better nutrition? His answer was biofortification, a process of naturally breeding sustenance crops so they are rich in micronutrients. After years of proof of concept research, in 2009, the nonprofit he founded—GHTC member HarvestPlus—introduced its first wave of crops in LMICs, providing nutrient-rich food for people in need. For decades, diagnosing multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-B) meant using older testing methods that took weeks to deliver results and required expensive laboratory equipment. In 2010, this began to change with the introduction of the Xpert MTB/RIF test, an automated diagnostic test developed by GHTC member FIND, which does not require microscopes or a laboratory, involves very little training to operate, and can deliver results in less than two hours, start to finish. FIND and partners will soon introduce a next-generation version—the Genexpert Omni—that is smaller, more portable, and battery-operated, which should further expand access to improved TB diagnosis. View a slideshow of more moments and milestones in global health R&D over the past decade. Here’s to ten more years of progress! At GHTC, we are proud to work with so many believers, innovators, and changemakers who are driving progress in global health. As we embark on 2018 and beyond, we recommit to continuing this momentum and look forward to another decade of advancing innovation to save lives.