News

Fungi have existed for hundreds of millions of years, long before dinosaurs walked the Earth, but fungal infections have become a rapidly growing challenge for human health in recent decades.Fungal diseases affect more than 300 million people each year, disproportionately impacting people in low-resource settings and those with weakened immune systems, including people living with HIV, cancer patients, and transplant recipients. Most fungal infections affect superficial tissue like the skin, nails, or hair and can cause chronic illness and productivity loss. Though less common, invasive fungal infections can spread throughout the body and are associated with high mortality.Why fungal diseases are becoming harder to ignoreThe rising incidence of fungal infections is driven by a variety of factors, including conflict, poverty, urbanization, pollution, travel, and climate change, which increase exposure, heighten vulnerability, and expand the reach of dangerous fungal pathogens. At the same time, advances in medicine mean more people are living longer with conditions that weaken the immune system, increasing the number of people at greater risk. Growing antifungal resistance is also making infections harder to treat and further limiting already scarce treatment options.Despite the mounting burden, fungal disease remains underprioritized, underdiagnosed, under-surveilled, and underfunded, making it one of the world’s most neglected global health threats.Why innovation is falling behindFungal infections receive less than 1.5 percent of all infectious disease research and development (R&D) funding, contributing to sparse pipelines for both therapeutics and diagnostics. Closing these gaps will require greater investment in R&D, particularly for tools designed for resource-constrained settings and targeting the pathogens that pose the greatest threat to human health. Stronger regulatory and procurement systems and international collaboration will also be essential to ensure emerging tools are affordable and accessible worldwide.Despite persistent gaps, several promising innovations demonstrate the potential for R&D to transform the global response to fungal disease.Promising advances in antifungal treatmentThere are currently only four classes of antifungal medicine available, many of which are associated with serious side effects or require lengthy, hospital-administered treatment courses. The pipeline of new antifungal therapies also remains thin.The World Health Organization (WHO) reported last year that only nine antifungal therapies were in clinical development to address WHO’s designated top four priority pathogens, including three in Phase 3 development. Although the Phase 3 trial for one of those candidates has since been terminated, another candidate, olorofim, developed by Shionogi and F2G, recently reported positive Phase 3 trial results. If approved, it could become the first antifungal treatment with a novel mechanism of action for that infection in more than 20 years.Earlier-stage research is also yielding promising advances. Researchers recently discovered that an antibiotic could target a priority fungal pathogen by switching it back from its invasive form to a less harmful form. This antibiotic could help existing antifungal drugs target dangerous fungal pathogens, allowing lower, less toxic doses of those drugs to be used.Together, these advances offer hope of a new generation of antifungal therapies.The future of fungal diagnosticsDiagnostic tools for critical fungal pathogens exist but with significant limitations, including invasive sampling requirements, long turnaround times, limited pathogen coverage, and inadequate sensitivity. Many also depend on sophisticated laboratories and highly trained staff, making them difficult to deploy in resource-constrained settings globally that bear a disproportionate burden of fungal disease.The MycoMEIA® assay developed at Johns Hopkins University and commercialized by Pearl Diagnostics represents a recent advance in antifungal diagnostics. The test received US Food and Drug Administration clearance in 2025. It uses a urine sample, which is much simpler and less invasive for patients than current options, and provides results in just a few hours.Another promising research development illustrates where fungal diagnostics may be headed next. Researchers at the Mayo Clinic and Zepto Life Technology recently reported early results from a new diagnostic platform that was able to identify 18 different fungal pathogens with a single test. While still in development, such approaches could not only streamline diagnosis for health care providers and patients, but also reduce costs and resource requirements, making them well-suited for resource-constrained settings.Closing the innovation gap Fungal diseases and antifungal resistance are attracting greater international attention, but the response still lags behind the scale and pace of this growing threat. Increased investment in the R&D of fit-for-purpose innovations, paired with stronger regulatory and health systems and global coordination, will be crucial to ensure new diagnostics and treatments emerge from the pipeline and reach the patients who need them most. 

Last week, Cepheid announced that its Xpert Hemorrhagic Fever Panel test has received Emergency Use Listing from the World Health Organization, enabling the technology to be deployed to help identify suspected cases and support outbreak containment in the rapidly growing outbreak of Bundibugyo Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The molecular panel test detects and identifies Ebola virus (multiple strains, including Bundibugyo), Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, Marburg virus, and Lassa virus, providing results in around an hour. The test runs on Cepheid’s GeneXpert diagnostic technology system, which is already widely used across Africa, helping enable rapid implementation. Cepheid previously donated an initial shipment of tests cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration through the Department of War, and the new listing now enables further deployment. A Phase 2 clinical trial led by the Serum Institute of India found that an experimental monoclonal antibody for dengue virus was safe, well-tolerated, and provided evidence of efficacy in a Phase 2 clinical trial. Dengue affects more than 200 million people each year and is a growing global threat due to the expanding range of the virus-carrying mosquito species. There are several licensed vaccines for dengue but no licensed antiviral drugs. The experimental antibody previously neutralized all four serotypes of dengue virus in animal studies and demonstrated safety in a Phase 1 trial in healthy adults. Researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have discovered rare antibodies that could inform the development of a therapeutic or preventive intervention for alpha-gal syndrome, an emerging tick-bite-associated condition behind a growing number of cases in the United States and globally, which can lead to allergic reactions to a molecule in red meat and other animal products. The discovery was made through malaria research—the scientists were originally trying to find antibodies that could target alpha-gal (a sugar molecule) on malaria parasites as a potential strategy for malaria prevention. In laboratory tests, the rare antibodies successfully hindered human allergic antibodies from binding to red meat allergens. There are currently no specific treatments or preventions for alpha-gal syndrome.

The Gates Foundation has awarded ProFound Therapeutics up to $35 million to find new drug targets for preeclampsia, a high blood pressure condition during pregnancy that can be severe for mother and child and is a significant contributor to maternal and fetal deaths globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. ProFound will utilize their vast repository of proteins and data to improve scientific understanding of how preeclampsia is developed in the body, with the goal of identifying promising approaches for future drug development. Once targets are identified, the company will explore their features using an AI tool and then evaluate them in laboratory experiments.Last week, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) announced that it will invest up to $16.5 million to advance the development of an African-developed vaccine candidate for the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, which is behind the fast-growing outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. CEPI’s support will help advance the candidate through preclinical development and into an early-stage clinical trial in Africa. The vaccine candidate uses a technology that is utilized by a licensed vaccine against smallpox and mpox and has elicited long-term immunity in a vaccine targeting the Zaire strain of Ebola. It is the fifth Bundibugyo-specific vaccine candidate supported by CEPI in response to the current outbreak and the only of the five designed to induce two major parts of the immune system, both B- and T-cells, for comprehensive and long-lasting immunity.A novel tuberculosis (TB) vaccine candidate failed to match the current, more-than-100-years-old vaccine in preventing TB infections in newborns, according to the recently shared results of a Phase 3 trial conducted among 6,897 healthy newborns in sub-Saharan Africa. TB remains the world’s leading infectious disease killer and there is an urgent need for a new vaccine—the current TB vaccine, BCG, is effective at preventing some types of TB in infants, but it offers inconsistent protection in adults against pulmonary TB. One of 17TB vaccine candidates in the pipeline, the vaccine in the trial, VPM1002, is a genetically modified recombinant BCG vaccine developed by the Serum Institute of India. While disappointing, the results of the trial do provide significant insights about how best to design robust, feasible efficacy trials for future vaccine candidates.

Last Thursday, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that, with support from Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, it will allocate 70,000 doses of an approved Ebola vaccine to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which is facing the largest Ebola outbreak in the country’s history. The vaccine, Ervebo, targets Ebola Zaire, the most common Ebola strain, not the Bundibugyo strain behind the current outbreak—for which there are no approved vaccines —but early laboratory and animal data suggest it may provide some cross-protection. Twenty thousand doses will be used in a Phase 3 trial to evaluate whether the vaccine offers cross-protection for Bundibugyo, while the remaining doses will be allocated to frontline health care workers, serving the dual goals of providing some protection for at-risk populations against severe illness and death during the current outbreak while gathering critical data to inform use of the vaccine in future Bundibugyo outbreaks.Researchers at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research have developed a rapid blood test that could improve detection of iron deficiency, a widespread health challenge disproportionately affecting mothers and children in low-resource settings where access to conventional laboratory-based screening methods are limited. Using a finger-prick blood sample, the test provides results within 15 minutes without the need for specialized laboratory infrastructure and highly trained health care providers. It has demonstrated strong correlation with gold-standard laboratory methods used in high-income countries and includes a built-in reference line to make the results easier to interpret. The test is currently undergoing evaluation in sub-Saharan Africa.The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) shared last week that it will dedicate $4.17 million to four research projects designed to assess whether additional vaccines currently or previously licensed against Ebola Zaire could offer some cross-protection against severe illness and death during the current rapidly growing outbreak of Bundibugyo Ebola. Specifically, the funding will go to teams at the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States; the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Belgium; the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom; and the MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research in the United Kingdom. The research teams will use blood samples from vaccinated individuals to assess immune responses and potential cross-reactivity of antibody responses, helping establish and standardize antibody tests for Bundibugyo, inform interpretation of clinical trial results, and guide future strategies. These research initiatives will support trials during the current outbreak and complement ongoing efforts to develop Bundibugyo-specific vaccines.